7 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE GREEK SYSTEM AND KOPPEN'S SYSTEM OF CLIMATE CLASSIFICATION
We have two types of climatic classifications, that is the Greek System of climatic classification and Köppen's scheme.
Both have their functions according to how they are used, we are going to look at this classification of climates one by one and also discuss how the Greek System and Köppen's scheme work together.
The Greek System climate classification
The Greeks were among the first set of people in the world to classify climates. Their scheme divided the world into the following three climatic zones based on temperature:
1. Torrid or Hot: Areas within the Tropics that experience intense heat.
2. Frigid or Very Cold: Areas of excessive cold in the Arctic and Antarctic regions.
3. Temperate or Mild: Areas lying between the torrid and frigid zones which are neither too hot nor too cold.
Köppen's Scheme of climate classification
Koppen went further to add secondary letters to the above letters in order to differentiate between sub-divisions within the five major groups. The secondary letters in Koppen's scheme climate classification and what they stand for are:
Merits of Koppen's Scheme:
It is simple.
It is quantitative because it has used numerical values to define the boundaries of climatic groups.
It makes it easy to ascribe a given place to a particular climate sub-group on the basis of temperature and precipitation.
Demerits of Koppen's Scheme:
It is inconsistent because he used mean temperature for his A, C,D, and E zones; whereas his zone B is based on precipitation - evaporation ratio.
It is not comprehensive enough because it has not taken the case of the climates of mountainous regions and regions affected by fog.
The boundaries of Köppen's climate types are too strictly empirical.

Comments
Post a Comment